Vibration risk evaluation in hand-held harvesters for olives

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the vibration transmitted to the hand-arm system by two electric portable harvesters, different for size and teeth features of the harvesting head. Moreover, being the bars of the two machines telescopic, they were operated at minimum and maximum length. The acceleration was measured, at different times, in two points, 1 m apart, next to the hand positions. Finally, measurements were carried out both at no load, in standard controlled conditions, and in field, under ordinary working conditions. To smooth the influence of external factors, the machines were operated by the same operator. The results showed that the greater and heavier harvesting head produced significantly higher acceleration at no load (10.7 m/s2 vs. 5.5 m/s2), and comparable acceleration at load (13.9 vs. 14.2 m/s2). On average, the vibration was significantly higher at load (14.0 vs. 8.1 m/s2). The difference between the two bar lengths was not statistically significant: 9.4 m/s2 when using the minimum length and 9.8 m/s2 when using the maximum one. Finally, the difference between the two measuring points was affected by the bar length: it was statistically significant when using the bar at its minimum length only. As far as the components are concerned, at no load the highest acceleration was measured along the bar axis for both harvesting heads (9.2 m/s2 for the greater head and 4.2 m/s2 for the smaller one). At load all the three components were comparable in the greater head (about 7.8 m/s2) whereas the x component was predominant in the other one (11.4 vs. 4.8 (y) and 6.6 m/s2 (z)).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2013-09-08
Keywords:
safety, vibration exposure, hand-arm system, facilitating machines
Statistics
Abstract views: 328

PDF: 183
Share it

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

How to Cite
Manetto, G., & Cerruto, E. (2013). Vibration risk evaluation in hand-held harvesters for olives. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 44(2s). https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2013.384